Sunday, April 27, 2014

Massachusetts OUI Law Traffic Attorneys Worcester Operating Influence Alcohol

Massachusetts OUI Law

Drunk driving or operating under the influence (OUI) is a serious crime in Massachusetts.  As such, you could face license suspension, steep fines, and even jail.  In Massachusetts operating under the influence (OUI), also known as driving under the influence (DUI), results in mandatory driver’s license suspension.

Below is a sample case of OUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with OUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is in MA? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with OUI in Massachusetts?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of OUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of OUI in Massachusetts.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense of OUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is in MA, contact our law firm for help. 

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Criminal Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Johnny v. Commonwealth

Facts:

A jury convicted defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI), negligent operation of a motor vehicle so as to endanger, and being a person under 21 years of age in possession of alcohol. The District Court Department in Worcester (Massachusetts) entered a finding of guilt as to the second offense portion of the OUI charge. Defendant appealed.

If you are facing a traffic case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Massachusetts Court made the following holding:

  • That the case against a defendant is "circumstantial" in some sense of that dubious term does not suggest that the proof is insufficient. While it is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the exclusive opportunity to commit the crime, and while the inferences need not be inescapable or necessary, the evidence must be such as to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, and no one else, committed the offence charged.
  • Substantive use of pretrial identification evidence is allowed, even if the witness testifies that he or she did not make such an identification.
An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

0 comments:

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #


Massachusetts

Cambridge 888-437-7747
Worcester 888-437-7747

About Mr. Gilmore

Mr. Gilmore earned his law degree at Boston University School of Law, one of the top law schools in the country. He obtained his undergraduate degree at Assumption College with a double major in Political Science and Philosophy. Prior to attending law school, he was a Bodily Injury Claims Adjuster with a large national insurer. Mr. Gilmore’s previous legal experience includes the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office and the Committee for Public Counsel Services-Trial Division. More about Gilmore

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts